Friday, July 30, 2010

Christianity Today's Anti-Christianity Today

T. A. McMahonBy T. A. McMahon
The Berean Call

According to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.org, "Christianity Today [CT] is an Evangelical Christian periodical based in Carol Stream, IL. It is the flagship publication of its parent company Christianity Today International, claiming readership of 290,000. The founder, Billy Graham, stated that he wanted to 'plant the evangelical flag in the middle-of-the-road, taking the conservative theological position but a definite liberal approach to social problems.'

"Today it, and its 13 sister publications, reach well over 2 million readers in its traditional paperbound form, and more than 10 million pageviews per month in their Internet form."
It was right after I became a born-again Christian more than thirty years ago that I encountered my first copy of Christianity Today. Having grown up Roman Catholic, my appetite for anything evangelical was ravenous. Yet even in those early years of my faith, there were things that I read in that magazine that troubled me. I recognized, in Mr. Graham's own words, "a definite liberal approach to social problems" in the promotion of "Christian" psychological counseling (see TBC, July 1999).

Of even more concern, however, were articles that clearly favored Roman Catholicism. This was disconcerting for one who had recently been delivered from the bondage of the false gospel of Rome. I remembered also reading an old quote from Billy Graham, which he had spoken nearly a decade before he started CT. He declared that "The three gravest menaces faced by orthodox Christianity are Communism, Roman Catholicism, and Mohammedanism" (Plains Baptist Challenger, March 1984). Incredibly, years later, among CT's contributing editors and writers were Roman Catholics, including Catholic priest Richard John Neuhaus. It was Neuhaus, along with CT editors Chuck Colson, J. I. Packer, Timothy George, Thomas Oden, Richard Mouw, and Mark Noll, among others, who formed, were promoters of, and/or were signers of "Evangelicals and Catholics Together: The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium." Their news release proclaimed:
"[L]eading Catholics and evangelicals are asking their flocks for a remarkable leap of faith: to finally accept each other as Christians....[E]vangelicals including Pat Robertson and Charles Colson joined with conservative Roman Catholic leaders today in upholding the ties of faith that bind [them]....They urged Catholics and evangelicals...to stop aggressive proselytization of each other's flocks."
The Catholic bias of CT is reflected in the modus operandi of Graham's crusades: they were, and continue to be, publicized and subsidized by each Catholic diocese where they take place. Additionally, the crusades continue to be outfitted with Catholic counselors who guide those Catholics that "come forward" to return to their local Catholic churches.

The list of Catholic luminaries celebrated by CT includes popes Benedict XVI and John Paul II (Graham told Larry King that he and the pope "agree on almost everything"), Mother Teresa, Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, Buddhist/Catholic monk Thomas Merton, and mystic Catholic priest Henry Nouwen. Catholic mysticism is further promoted by CT contributing editor Richard Foster, who is the godfather of the modern contemplative/mystical (read "Eastern") movement within evangelical Christianity.

It seems that no voice that advances apostasy has been omitted from CT's list of contributing editors or writers: Ron Sider, President Obama's leftist theologian; Notre Dame professor Mark Noll; Eugene Peterson (who wrote his own bible called The Message); Eastern Orthodox followers Frederica Mathewes-Green and Bradley Nassif; former executive editor Terry Muck (who writes of his love for the Buddha); Leith Anderson (who promotes the experiential over the propositional, i.e., that emergent experience trumps doctrine); and psychology and Bible integrationist Eric L. Johnson, to name but a few.

All of this leads us to Christianity Today's senior managing editor, Mark Galli, and his article of July 15, 2010, titled "Divine Drama Queen," which is his characterization of the God of the Bible. We've reprinted here extensive excerpts of CT's God-demeaning/man-exalting article (albeit reluctantly, due to its wicked content) as further evidence of this "evangelical" magazine's continuing slither into the last days' apostasy. What Galli has written is CT's latest installment of corrupting the faith, generated from decades of undermining the Word of God and distorting the God of the Bible. Editor Galli makes this so obvious that what he writes needs few comments on my part. Nevertheless, his writing is in italics, and my words appear in brackets and regular type:
I like a tranquil, even-keeled, self-controlled God. A God who doesn't fly off the handle at the least provocation. A God who lives one step above the fray. A God who has that British stiff upper lip even when disaster is looming.

When I read my Bible, though, I keep running into a different God, and I'm not pleased. This God says he "hates" sin. Well, he usually yells it. Read the prophets. It's just one harangue after another, all in loud decibels. And when the shouting is over, then comes the pouting.

Take his conversation with Hosea....He orders Hosea to take a prostitute for a wife; she becomes a symbol of Israel's unfaithfulness to God. This is no down-on-her-luck-but-with-a-heart-of-gold prostitute like those so often portrayed in movies. This is some sleazy woman who, even when given a chance at a decent life, keeps "whoring."

God then tells Hosea to have children with this woman. When the children are born, he tells Hosea to call the first Jezreel, explaining, "I will break the bow of Israel in the Valley of Jezreel." The second, God calls No Mercy, because "I will no more have mercy on the house of Israel, to forgive them at all." The third he calls Not My People, "for you are not my people, and I am not your God" (Hosea 1:1-9).

This God is like the volatile Italian woman who, upon discovering her husband's unfaithfulness, yells and throws dishes, refuses to sleep in the same bed, and doesn't speak to him for 40 days and 40 nights.
[I refrained from drawing conclusions up to this point on my first reading of this article because I suspected that Galli would indicate his own misunderstanding of God. I guessed wrong. This is the kind of blasphemy that one would expect from militant atheists and humanists, such as Richard Dawkins, or foul-mouthed, Christ-mocking comedians like Bill Maher. It is total blasphemy - a mischaracterization of God as well as a denigration of His perfectly holy character.]
We may think this a crude depiction, except that Jesus - God with us - seems to suffer the same emotional imbalance. He rants about Pharisees and Scribes - or "snakes" and "hypocrites," as he calls them. So upset is he over sacrilege in the Temple, he overturns tables and drives people out with a whip. And then we find him lamenting, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you would not! See, your house is left to you desolate!"(Matthew 23:37-38). This God knows nothing about being a non-anxious presence. This is a very anxious God, indeed.
[It's difficult to restrain anger here. The Creator of the universe, the sacrificial Lamb of God, who paid the full penalty for our sins, and His Father, who sent Him to the Cross for our sake - they suffer from "emotional imbalance"?! They - whose Word tells us to be anxious for nothing - they are anxious?]
I'd rather have a God who takes sin in stride. Why can't he relax and recognize that to err is human. I mean, you don't find us flawed humans freaking out about one another's sins. You don't see us wrathful, indignant, and pouting. Why can't God almighty just chill out and realize we're just human?
[Has the reader been manipulated by Galli into fleshing out his own similar thoughts about God? Will he now set the record straight?]
It's that little phrase, "we're just human," that may be the rub with God. Sin seems to be a big deal to God because apparently we're a big deal to him. That little phrase, "we're just human," signals that we may not be as big a deal to ourselves....[God] believes that to be human is to be destined for glory. As Peter put it, he has "called us to his own glory and excellence," that we "may become partakers of the divine nature" (2 Peter 1:3-4).
[So much for repenting of the character assassination of God the Father and God the Son. Instead, Galli panders to mankind's self-image, dangling before us the "glory" of humanity. He then leads the reader to the next step, self-deification - the same lie that Satan offered to Eve in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:5).]
That's right: he [God] thinks "just humans" can become nothing less than gods. Not in the sense of beings who should be worshipped, but beings who have become, in the fullest sense, bearers of the image and likeness of their Creator....He created beings with deep awareness of themselves and their Creator, who could envision the absolute heights they could scale and the perfect love they could enjoy, and who knew they could have all this forever and ever....
[Nowhere in Scripture do you find the word "god" (with a lowercase "g" ) ever used to denote a righteous person or entity.]
...And yet God gambled. He has thrown everything into this grand enterprise. He made the creation of these beings not a matter of course or compromise, but a matter of life or death. Everything was on the line with this roll of the dice. To win meant for these creatures a bliss that only God knows. To lose meant death and eternal destruction. There was no holding back. God was going to make human glory a winner-take-all proposition, even if it killed him.
[God gambled? Does he mean that God doesn't know how things will turn out? This is the heresy of Open Theism, which denies God's omniscience - denies that He is the God of prophecy as He proclaimed in Isaiah 46:9-10: "Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done...."]
So when things start going south, we find him throwing dishes and slamming doors....God rants at us as an Olympian curses himself for losing concentration during a crucial part of the race. Or as a novelist chastises herself for lazy writing. For the righteous perfectionist (versus the neurotic perfectionist), every detail matters. God wants nothing less than perfection, because he knows that perfection is the only way for us to become what he created us to become: godlike.
[Galli must be having flashbacks to his college Greek mythology classes. At least I hope that's his excuse. Of course, he could plead insanity. How much more irrational could one be than to posit a "righteous perfectionist" who throws dishes, slams doors, rants, and curses himself. Again, this is unashamed blasphemy. It is anti-Christianity from Christianity Today.]
When the stakes are so high, of course, the consequence of failure, even in the smallest detail, spells disaster. It's like a space shuttle - one of the most sophisticated and marvelous of machines - crashing to earth because of a faulty oil ring. When God sees the space shuttle hurtling toward its destruction, he weeps, he rants, he pulls his hair out. And something inside him dies. Our God cares about us frail, fickle, weak human beings because he knows something we often forget: we're not "just human." He'll go to any length to get us to grasp and live into our glory, even if it kills him.
[Our glory? What about the glory of God that Galli has dragged through the gutter of his paganized imagination?]
This is why the Bible traffics in such dramatic language. There is nothing cautious, careful, or reasonable about the human enterprise. It's about being lost or saved. Living in darkness or in light. Knowing despair or being filled with hope. Death or life. The Bible is not interested in a religion that merely improves the human condition, or makes life manageable. It's not about success or happiness or helping us all get along. These are paltry aspirations. No, what God wants is to raise the dead and make gods out of sinners.
[No! Once again, that was Satan's goal.]
So what we have, for better or worse, is a melodramatic God. He yells and throws dishes, and walks off in a huff, slamming the door behind him-and then he turns around and gives his life for us. In a foreshadowing of Jesus, he says to Israel through Hosea: "How can I give you up, O Ephraim? How can I hand you over, O Israel?...for I am God and not a man, the Holy One in your midst, and I will not come in wrath" (Hosea 11:8-9). He's anything but calm and collected, reassuring and reasonable. He's as mercurial as gods go.

[God is] like the crazy uncle in the family. At some point, you have to let your friends know about him, but you'd just as soon avoid having to introduce him.

I much prefer reasonable religion with reasonable expectations, and a God who doesn't get bent out of shape every time his people trip up. But then again, I don't love as God loves. Not God. Not others. Not myself.
[So, are we to suppose that Galli was just trying to get our attention with his blasphemies for effect? Did we misunderstand his "literary cleverness"? No. What he paraded before us was a mockery of God akin to what Jesus suffered from those who gathered to watch Him being crucified and to what every God-hating humanist has since voiced.]
The road to hell is paved with reasonable religion with a non-anxious god. Most days, I'm pretty happy driving down that road. But I keep running into this Crazy Fellow along the way. At every stop light, he jumps up and down to get my attention. He pounds on my window asking me where the heck I think I'm going. He stands on the front bumper, shouting at me to turn around. When all else fails, he throws himself in front of the car. He's such a drama queen.
[Galli is "pretty happy" driving down the road to hell? God is a Crazy Fellow? God is a Drama Queen? I have two suggestions: 1) Send your reaction to Galli's article to the founder and honorary chairman of CT, Billy Graham, noting what seems to be the ultimate degeneration of what he started, and 2) Pray for Mark Galli, that he will repent. "[Regarding the wicked] there is no fear of God before his eyes" (Ps 36:1).

(Billy Graham's address: BGEA, 1 Billy Graham Parkway, Charlotte, NC 28201)


Related Links
CHRISTIANITY TODAY WITH GOD AS “DIVINE DRAMA QUEEN” - Apprising Ministries
An Introduction to the Open Theism Controversy - SpiritandTruth.org (Andy Woods)
Catholic Questions - GotQuestions.org
The Shameful Social Gospel - The Berean Call (T.A. McMahon)
Showtime for the Sheep? The Church and the Passion of the Christ - T.A. McMahon (Book)

This Week on 'The Hal Lindsey Report'

Hal LindseyBy Hal Lindsey
The Hal Lindsey Report

Under the leadership of President Obama, Israeli-US relations have taken quite a beating. His 'popularity' ratings in Israel are in the single digits. The Israeli public simply does not trust him and they feel like America has thrown Israel under the bus.

Apparently, that didn't bother the Administration and it was "full speed ahead" in the drive to cozy up to the Arab-Muslim world. It seemed that no cost was too great - even abandoning Israel - if it accomplished the President's goal of American-Muslim affinity.

But now we know that there really was a point at which the cost became too great. The Democrat National Committee recently realized that it was many millions of dollars down in its fundraising for the upcoming mid-term elections. And it was glaringly apparent that the constituency from which the giving had dried up was the American Jewish community. So, as I reported a couple of weeks ago, the White House went into damage control mode and started a charm offensive toward Israel and the Jewish community.

White House operatives fanned out and began to sweet talk the Jewish organizations here in the States. President Obama invited Prime Minister Netanyahu back to the White House and, evidently, promised that he'd be a better host this time than he was last March. He might even allow himself to be seen in public with the Prime Minister and certainly wouldn't stomp out of any meetings and leave the PM sitting, staring at the walls.

So Netanyahu returned and everyone made nice before the cameras. Obama even walked Netanyahu out to his car and added some extra pumps to his farewell handshake!

This past week, an Assistant Secretary of State appeared before a Jewish audience and confirmed that, indeed, "Israel is a vital ally and cornerstone of our regional security commitments." Now, that sounds pretty good at first, but I think it woefully understates the case. Israel is not just a "vital ally" in that region. Israel is our ONLY ally in the Middle East.

What's more, unlike our other friends in the area who are simply 'allies of convenience,' Israel and the United States are natural allies because we share common values, freedoms, ideals, goals, ideologies, and respect for human rights and the law. We even share a common Bible. Many Israeli citizens were born and reared in the US. The Mosaic Law is the foundation of our own law. And our rule of law is a big part of what makes America so successful. To say Israel is anything less than our greatest ally - especially in the Middle East - is to be less than clear-eyed or honest.

Yet, despite all this, the Bible says that eventually Israel will stand completely alone and friendless against the entire world.

Where's America?

I believe these are dangerous days for the United States. Paul predicts that, in the last days, "perilous times" will come. He also describes what I believe will be the condition of the world's most Christian nation in those days. Here is his portrait:

"...men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving (one translation says 'without natural affection'), unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power...."
If I didn't know better, I would say Paul had just spent the evening watching network television (and flipping over occasionally to MSNBC). Could you paint a better picture of America at this very moment?

Jesus even described the Western church in these days. He said,
"Because you say, 'I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing' - and do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked...."
He also declared that since we were so self-absorbed and influenced by the world's decadence that we would be neither cold nor hot, but lukewarm. And that made Jesus nauseous.

So, now I can see why Israel will be completely alone in the future. America won't matter anymore.

However, though God's People will face terrible times in the future, they will not be completely abandoned. Jesus Himself will return to fight for them. And for those of us who have accepted the pardon He died to purchase? The news is even better. We won't be here for those terrible times. You see, we will be where Jesus is because He will snatch us away before those troubles begin.

As we say in Texas, if that ain't Good News, I don't know what is!

[Don't miss this week's Report on TBN, Daystar, Inspiration, CPM Network, various local stations, http://www.hallindsey.com/ or http://www.hischannel.com/. Check your local listings.]


Related Links
Support for Israel Near Record High, Poll Shows - Baltimore Jewish Times
Israel Through The Eyes Of Scripture - SpiritandTruth.org (Tony Garland)
Dems in Congress get talking points to show Israel support - Jweekly.com
The Last Days Apostasy of the Church (Part 1) - BPB (Andy Woods)
Vanished into Thin Air: The Hope of Every Believer - Hal Lindsey (Book)

Obama Official Led Soros Fund Supporting World Government

Aaron KleinBy Aaron Klein
WorldNetDaily

President Obama's assistant secretary of state for population, refugees and migration, Eric P. Schwartz, previously served as the director of a George Soros-funded organization that promoted global governance.

Schwartz also coordinated meetings on behalf of Obama's transition team with a group that advocates placing more blue United Nations helmets on U.S. troops and coercing the U.S. to join the U.N.'s International Criminal Court, which could prosecute American citizens and soldiers for "war crimes" and other offenses.

A 2009 report by Cliff Kincaid, president of America's Survival Inc, warned joining the International Criminal Court "could spark a revolt in the U.S. Armed Forces."

In a separate posting, Kincaid wrote, "Schwartz and his associates are clearly laying the groundwork for the Obama Administration's acceptance of and membership in the International Criminal Court."

Prior to his appointment to the State Department last year, Schwartz served as executive director of the U.S. Connect Fund, a Soros-funded and affiliated organization. The group promotes global governance and states on its website its mission is to influence "policy through integrative collaborative grant making on human rights, non-proliferation, climate change and development, and effective foreign assistance."

The Connect Fund provides grants to pro-U.N. groups such as Human Rights First, which states it used top military brass to secure U.S. politicians' commitments against torture. Another grantee, the Center for Victims of Torture, produced a draft executive order against torture endorsed by prominent national security figures. Months later, a virtually identical executive order was issued by Obama.

Groups funded by Schwartz's organization organized a January 2009 national conference call to promote a "Responsible U.S. Global Engagement" agenda for Obama's new administration.

Schwartz himself has authored numerous op-eds in major national newspapers calling for more U.S. global engagement.

Schwartz previously worked under Bill Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, in a position, he boasted on his Connect Fund website bio, that allowed him to initiate and manage "the White House review that resulted in U.S. signature of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court," which would subject U.S. citizens to international prosecution for "war crimes."

Later, President Bush's U.N. ambassador, John Bolton, led the effort for the U.S. to pull out of the International Criminal Court, a victory Bolton touted as the "happiest moment" of his political career until that point.

Schwartz's assistant at the Connect Fund, Heather B. Hamilton, who now serves as senior policy advocate at the fund, led the group's efforts to lobby against Bush's appointment of Bolton.

While Schwartz was serving Obama's transition team as adviser on U.N. issues, he coordinated several meetings with the Washington Working Group on the International Criminal Court, which wants the U.S. to re-enter that agreement.

The Working Group is a project of the Citizens for Global Solutions, or CGS, a grassroots organization that envisions a "future in which nations work together to abolish war, protect our rights and freedoms and solve the problems facing humanity that no nation can solve alone."

Hamilton, Schwartz's deputy, served as executive vice president of CGS.

The CGS mission states it seeks, "More Blue (U.N.) Helmets on U.S. Troops."

On a CGS blog post that has since been removed but was documented by Kincaid's organization, the group says that in a meeting with Schwartz, it not only discussed more U.N. helmets on U.S. troops, but also asked of Obama:

  • Pay $1.6 billion to the U.N. for U.S. "arrears" to the U.N.
  • Lift the cap on payments to the U.N. for U.N. military operations.
  • Ensure "adequate resources" for and increase U.S. participation in U.N. military activities.
  • Restrict the use of the U.S. veto at the U.N. so U.N. involvement in international conflicts and situations can be increased.
  • Support expansion of U.N. departments.


Related Links
Soros Plots Plunder of 2012 Election - Canada Free Press
Does the Bible prophesy a one-world government and a one-world currency in the end times? - GotQuestions.org
U.N. rights body tells Israel to end Gaza blockade - Reuters
Want Middle East Stability? Move UN to Iraq - PostGlobal
The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists - Aaron Klein (Book)

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Praying Against Arizona

Mark TooleyBy Mark Tooley
Institute on Religion & Democracy

No doubt spiritually energized by the latest anti-Arizona court ruling, a phalanx of religious left groups has orchestrated an “Isaiah 58 Solidarity Vigil and Fast for Arizona” across America to protest Arizona’s new immigration enforcement law and to push for national liberalized immigration. The coalition explains:

The anti-immigration bill that recently became law in Arizona has galvanized the faith community to stand with our immigrant brothers and sisters and stand against those who seek to divide our communities and distract from the real solution to our broken immigration system: comprehensive immigration reform.
The Isaiah solidarity prayer vigil and fast across the Summer was conceived by the Interfaith Immigration Coalition, a religious left lobby group for liberalized immigration. Members include Jim Wallis’s Sojourners, United Methodist, Presbyterian, United Church of Christ, and Episcopal Church agencies, left-wing Catholic groups like Pax Christi, and the Islamic Immigration Center, among others.

Perhaps concerned that other states might follow Arizona’s example, the Isaiah solidarity coalition has organized 8 weeks of “constant prayer and public witness” leading up to the Arizona law’s scheduled August implementation (at least before the court ruling) in service of “loosening the chains of injustice.”

Evidently this particular religious left coalition, like others, deems almost any kind of immigration law enforcement as “racist” and “anti-immigrant” by definition. Condescendingly, its activists, who are overwhelmingly liberal white Anglos, assume they speak for all immigrants and U.S. Hispanics. And they ignore that in fact many legal immigrants agree with most native born U.S. citizens that security and national sovereignty require defensible borders and immigration law enforcement.

While many advocates of liberalized immigration policies at least pay some lip service to border security and law enforcement, much of this religious left coalition is discomfited by either. They instead dream of a United States without borders, constantly welcoming whoever wants to enter, automatically offering tax-funded social services to everyone, and somehow atoning for, through such liberality, America’s ostensibly chronic racism and imperialism, which purportedly have generated poverty south of the border and around the world.

The Isaiah prayer and fast coalition professes to “stand with our immigrant brothers and sisters,” but they are not standing with legal immigrants who struggle to find work in a recession economy and who are most imperiled by unrestricted immigration. And the utopian religious left does not accept that anybody can be “illegal,” because anyone from anywhere should be able to move into the U.S. at any time. One Catholic college president recently argued that it was idolatrous to allow free trade of commodities while restricting the movement of peoples, since the former purportedly morally elevates material goods over humans. He claimed a virtually unlimited “human right” to migrate.

Human rights traditionally have argued against nations forcibly preventing their population from leaving, a la the Berlin Wall. But do human rights compel all nations automatically to grant quick entrance to all comers? The moral distinction is similar to the difference between holding a visitor in your home against his or her will, which the law typically regards as abduction or enslavement, versus requiring you to open your home to all potential uninvited guests, no matter their behavior or length of stay or attitude towards you as the owner. And as to the distinction between free trade and unlimited immigration, wheat and electronics and automobiles are perishables whose purchase and sales are regulated by the open market. Humans obviously have vastly more moral importance, require far more attention and services, exert a much larger economic and cultural impact, and, unlike televisions or cell phones, have families with their own complicated requirements.

Of course, there are extreme libertarians who would treat immigrants as commodities simply meeting economic needs. But presumably religious groups should not share that perspective. Nations are morally empowered to control immigration precisely because both potential immigrants and citizens have enormous moral importance and merit protection from avoidable upheaval and disruption. But the Isaiah prayer and fast coalition disapproves of regulated borders, complaining that immigration law enforcement results in families “ripped apart” and “racial profiling.”

Unsurprisingly, the Episcopal Church stands with the Isaiah fast and prayer coalition. Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori recently blamed the U.S. for encouraging illegal immigration because we have a “broken system that encourages people to come here to work or to study – and then to stay [by creating legal, social, and economic ties] — without adequate opportunity to do so in a legal way.” In other words, persons in the U.S. on temporary work or student visas have an automatic right to remain indefinitely? Schori wants churches to “challenge the legal realities of this country when they’re unjust.” But she seems to think any legal restrictions on immigration are manifestly “unjust.”

Darkly, Bishop Schori linked America’s supposed injustice against illegal immigrants to other American outrages:
Once we’ve done it in one segment of our legal system, it’s easy to translate that into other segments of our legal system: the way we’ve treated prisoners in Guantanamo, the way we’ve treated prisoners - apparent prisoners of war — in other parts of the world is not unrelated.
Here is how the religious left often sees America: a malevolent prison keeper.

Every year, America invites in one million more legal immigrants, and naturalizes another one million who are already here. Probably, the U.S. is unequaled in the world in its liberality towards immigrants. But the prayers and fasters of the religious left’s “Isaiah 58 Solidarity Vigil and Fast for Arizona” coalition prefer not to admit America’s generosity, preferring their notion of America as global villain. It’s amazing that so many in the world still want to come to America, despite its supposed nastiness.


Related Links
Surviving the Obama Assault on the Rule of Law - The Heritage Foundation
Arizona immigration law 2010: As SB1070 takes effect, Mexicans say 'Adios, Arizona' - Christian Science Monitor
Arizona's Altered Immigration Law Takes Effect, State Heads Back to Court - FOX News
Arizona Has It Right - BPT (Chuck Baldwin)
Taking Back the United Methodist Church - Mark Tooley (Book)

Suffering Continues in Darfur

Chuck MisslerBy Dr. Chuck Missler
Koinonia House

For an estimated three million Darfur villagers, it's been seven long years of bombs dropped by (old Russian ex-military planes) camel-back raids, displacement, rape, and being robbed of humanitarian aid. For refugees unable to leave the region, it's been as many as seven years in makeshift homes without basic utilities like clean water or electricity, public schools, jobs, markets, doctors' offices or hospitals. And for the orphaned, it's been as many as seven years without parents to provide or care for them.

In 2004, George W. Bush declared Sudan's National Congress Party's military-backed burning, bombing, and raiding of Darfur region villages a "genocide". Though many people recognized that the incessant pillaging of the Masalit, Fur, and Zaghawa villages equalled the systematic destruction of Sudan's black Christians and animists, the UN and the International Criminal Court have not seen fit, until this July, to indict Bashir with genocide for the initial attacks that took place years ago. The fallout amounts to a virtual lost generation of uneducated, voiceless, landless, and orphaned.

This past March, just when the beleaguered folks living in displacement had an offer of democratic election dangled before them, it was whisked away. Voters were excluded or dissuaded by violence, a much-disputed 2008 national census, and by the ballot-box-stuffing of Khartoum insiders. It was a reign in which the Janjaweed militia targeted and torched specific villages, slaughtered inhabitants, and pursued the survivors into the nether regions simply for belonging to ethnic groups suspected of sympathy with rebels. Omar al-Bashir has been the head of state who mandated, commissioned, supplied, and gave his blessing to it all. And in April of 2010, his displaced and ravaged and orphaned voters supposedly re-elected him - an accused genocidal maniac - to an eight-year term as their first democratically chosen leader in 20 years.

Yes, April saw Sudan's first multi-party election in 20 years. The campaign months of March and April saw the voting populace and activists intimidated, beaten, subjected to false arrest, held prisoner, or threatened with sexual assault - at the hands of Sudan's security forces. Omar al-Bashir, backed by his National Congress Party (built upon what was the National Islamic Front Party) won, and though the international community admitted that the election was skewed, there seems to have been little other public outcry in defense of his "constituents."

Al-Bashir's ruling party assures outsiders that the tribes have always fought amongst themselves, and that his government is not to blame. Some accounts, such as that given by Roger Winter of the US Agency for International Development, indicate that the violence is indeed coming from the capital of Khartoum and the Arab-Muslim government of Bashir.

So far, peace agreements that Bashir has signed, such as the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005, have been nothing more than empty promises meant for show or appeasement, since conditions haven't really changed anything in Darfur.

The International Criminal Court, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International have called for officials in the neighboring country of Chad, which is an ICC signatory, to arrest and turn Bashir over to the court for trial. Sudan signed a peace treaty this year with Chad, and Bashir is known to be hosting him this month for the Community of Sahel-Saharan States conference on July 22nd. The government of Chad refused to detain Bashir, saying that it would be wrong to invite Omar al-Bashir into their country and then arrest him. Chad's government prefers to let Bashir rest in the hands of the African Union, which has a track record of repeatedly brushing off opportunities for Bashir's arrest. So much for the international community's ability to mete out justice.

While the news has quieted about Darfur in recent years, the trauma has not gone away. We need to consider our brothers and sisters in danger as though we were in danger ourselves and remember Sudan in prayer.


Related Links


Human Rights Groups Call on President Obama to Respond to ICC Arrest Warrant for Sudanese President - Save Darfur Coalition
Chad Declines to Arrest Visiting President of Sudan Omar Al-Bashir - VOA
Sudan Church Rebuilding Project - Samaritan's Purse
Missing Pilot, Abducted Aid Worker Add to Darfur Woe - AOL News
Prophecy 20/20: Profiling the Future Through the Lens of Scripture - Chuck Missler (Book)

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

A Dangerous Precedent

Michael G. MickeyBy Michael G. Mickey
RaptureAlert.com

A federal judge today ruled in favor of Eastern Michigan University's recent decision to remove a Christian student from its graduate program in school counseling because she refused to provide counseling for homosexual clients on the basis of her religious beliefs.

The student, Julea Ward, had filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against the school leading up to today's court ruling after she was told by the school that she would "only be allowed to remain in the program if she went through a “remediation” program so that she could “see the error of her ways” and change her belief system about homosexuality", according to a Fox News report.

For a school to tell Miss Ward that she would have to change her "belief system" and "see the error of her ways" in order to continue obtaining her education was nothing short of asking her to deny the Word of God and, essentially, refute her Christian faith. No matter what any judge says to the contrary, that's the bottom line and today's court decision has set a dangerous precedent for Christian students across the United States of America.

For now, it appears, public universities around the country, the majority of which are so liberal that Christian students are already ridiculed beyond what should be acceptable for refusing to believe in politically correct societal trends that fly in the face of God's Word, are going to be able to require Christian students to compromise their faith without fear of reprisal - and we can be near certain it is going to occur on the heels of this ruling, which the Alliance Defense Fund is going to be appealing on behalf of Miss Ward.

For a long time now, Christians in the United States have avoided the sharp sting of persecution others have known in nations less free than our own, but the spirit of antichrist is flourishing in the hallowed halls of government and courtrooms all over our nation today. Should the Lord delay His coming much longer, this incident will pale in comparison to what the future holds for biblically principled Christians. We can take that to the bank.

Come quickly, Lord Jesus!


Related Links


Court Upholds Expulsion of Counseling Student Who Opposes Homosexuality - FOX News
Another Counseling Student Harrassed for Christian Beliefs Appeals Court Ruling - LifeSiteNews.com
Court sides with university, ADF to appeal - OneNewsNow
PC Wins Again: EMU Student Expelled for Opposing Homosexuality - Beliefnet.com (Blog)
Two cases pit gay rights against religious values - Washington Post (Blog)

When the Watchmen Are Silenced

Jan MarkellBy Jan Markell
Olive Tree Ministries

There is now a war on words in America. The battle to further censor words, transform words, twist words, and silence words is raging. The Left in leadership is determined to rob Americans of one freedom after another but the greatest loss would be our free speech. As stated in the July 26 issue of The American Thinker,

"It's a frightening thought: Government takeover of the media. But having tightened their grip on health care, financial services, and energy, it's only logical that the Democrats should turn their attention to the media.

"Discussions underway at the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission point toward a dangerous new effort to regulate what Americans read and hear. The takeover under discussion would apply across the board to print media, radio and television, and the Internet. The result of proposed regulations would be nothing less than an end to free speech in America."
As Jack Kinsella states in his recent commentary,
"In April, a three-judge panel in Washington threw out the FCC's attempt to impose 'net neutrality' regulations on the Internet, ruling the FCC does not have the power to do so. The FCC responded in a statement saying the decision did not 'close the door to other methods for achieving this important end.'"
In other words, the battle has begun and if plan "A" doesn't work, they will opt for plan "B" or "C" to get America to resemble Venezuela when it comes to freedom of the press, Internet, radio, etc.

Kinsella continues,
"America's mainstream news organizations are already consolidated in the hands of just five mega-corporations. We warned back in 2003 of the dangers associated with putting too much power into the hands of so few."
Kinsella also states that "One of the very first targets of the Obama administration's 'fundamental transformation' was - and still is - what Obama's FCC calls, "the reinvention of journalism."

(Note: We highly recommend Kinsella's daily Omega Letter Intelligence Digest. Learn more here.)

Forces of darkness are wheeling and dealing, planning and scheming, to keep you from knowing the truth. And while some proponents of evil are principalities and powers of the air, many more are politicians dressed in expensive suits and very polished foreign-made shoes that match their gigantic self image as power-brokers. To carry out their schemes, they must silence opponents and truth-tellers. They must shut down all conservative and Christian voices. Make no mistake that they will try, whether it be through the unfair "Fairness Doctrine" or something akin to it but renamed. They may face battles in the courts but nothing will deter the present powers that be from controlling what you and I hear and read.

The Federal Communications Commission and Federal Trade Commission are the major players in this effort.

How would this work? Under the proposed changes, government would have the right to impose taxes on selected media (including Internet service providers and Internet sites) and redistribute funds to traditional liberal news media. Government could impose a fairness doctrine on the internet as well as on radio - thus forcing conservative media to "balance" their programming by including liberal commentary. Government would also be granted a wide range of options for subsidizing liberal media, including perpetual grants of taxpayer money to left-leaning publications like The New York Times and to increase funding for "progressive" media such as National Public Radio and The Public Broadcasting System. These are the antics of any totalitarian dictatorship be they in a sophisticated nation or a banana republic. And such rules may be coming to a town near you.

You may not willingly want to go back with me to the era of the Third Reich but you must. We have to learn from it. As Irwin Lutzer writes in his new book, When a Nation Forgets God: 7 Lessons We Must Learn from Nazi Germany,
"Hitler believed that spoken words could convert anybody to a radical agenda. But Hitler didn't have the powers of today's media. Think of what Hitler could have done if he could have used today's TV, radio, Internet, etc."
Perhaps he really could have taken over the world in a later era. (May I add parenthetically that this book is must reading.)

Those who are concerned about a government takeover of the media need only recall the name of Joseph Goebbels. It was Goebbels manipulation of the media that brought Hitler to power and secured his control over Germany right up to the end of the regime. It was Goebbels who organized the candlelight processions, mass meetings, national radio broadcasts (over the objection of independent station owners,) and the eventual seizure of all print and electronic media.

Isn't it interesting that according to the Bible, in the last days the antichrist will control everything people see, hear and read? The power of the Satanic trinity will enter into every home. It says in Revelation 13:7 that "Power was given him over all kindred, tongues, and nations." This future fuehrer will have the task of propagandizing the world through a controlled media. This antichrist will be a passionate leader with an appealing message and the power of oratory that will be out of this world because his power comes from another world. He will be a master of doublespeak. But he must silence his opponents.

Am I saying that Obama and his cohorts will play a role in the the antichrist administration? Perhaps play a role in antichrist's administration, but Barack Obama is only the forerunner of this evil man. We saw this in the campaign of 2008 as Obama's world tour provided a foretaste of the reception the antichrist can expect to receive. The antichrist will stand in some capitals, addressing the people of the world and telling them that he is the one they have been waiting for. He will even reveal how he will solve the world's debt problem. He will be received like a rock star and get the same kind of greeting Obama got in Berlin.

Everything is shaping up for him to make his appearance. The clock is ticking.
"When you see these things begin to happen, look up and know your Redeemer draws nigh" (Luke 21:28).
It won't be long. One can almost hear the hoof beats of the four horsemen of the apocalypse off in the distance. Keep looking up even if you develop a stiff neck.


Related Links
The U.N. Threat to Internet Freedom - Wall Street Journal
DISCLOSE Act – Cloture Fails - The Heritage Foundation
The Internet Obamanation - BPT (Jack Kinsella)
Press advocates pan FTC's suggestions to aid journalism - First Amendment Center
Journalism Doesn’t Need a Bailout - FOX News
Trapped in Hitler's Hell - Jan Markell (Book)

The Winepress of the Wrath of God

Ed HindsonBy Dr. Ed Hindson
World Prophetic Ministry

Q. The end of Revelation Chapter 14 talks about treading the winepress of the wrath of God. What does this mean?

A. In Revelation Chapter 14, three angels appear, coming out of the Temple in Heaven. Presumably, at this point, Heaven is still opened, as it has been since Revelation 11:19. The second of these angels has a sharp sickle. A third angel appears and gives instructions to the second angel with the sickle, as seen in the following passage:

“… Thrust in thy sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully ripe. And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God. And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs,” (Revelation 14:18-20).
In ancient times, grapes were harvested, collected, and dumped into the wine press. There, they were crushed and the juice ran out and was collected in wine vats. The red stain of the juice and the staining of one’s feet and garments comprise a picture of Divine judgment (See also Genesis 49:10-11 and Isaiah 63:1-4).

The “winepress of the wrath of God” symbolizes the severity of this judgment. Its location is “without the city,” indicating that it will take place near, but not in, Jerusalem. Later, in Revelation 16:16, John will pinpoint it at Armageddon, which is about 50 miles northwest of Jerusalem.

This final conflict is so severe that the blood of those killed runs “unto the horse bridles.” It covers “a thousand and six hundred furlongs,” or about 200 miles. This is the distance between Bozrah in Edom, alluded to in Isaiah 63:1, and the Valley of Megiddo, the locale of Armageddon.

Although this river of blood suggests the result of direct combat on the battlefield, such devastation would be hard to explain aside from nuclear war or other weapons of mass destruction. Whatever the means that are utilized to effect this desolation, the Bible emphasizes that ultimately, it is God’s Divine retribution on a world that has rejected Him.


Related Links
Ancient Wine Press - Bible History Online
What is the battle of Armageddon? - GotQuestions.org
Revelation 14 - SpiritandTruth.org (Tony Garland)
The Wrath of God - Grace to You (John MacArthur)
Revelation (Twenty-First Century Biblical Commentary) - Edward E. Hindson (Book)

 



Get Our Latest Posts Via Email • It's Free!


Delivered By FeedBurner